Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided August 6, 1991No. Record No. 0459-90-2PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BARROW, J.

This appeal is from a conviction of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. We conclude that insufficient justification existed for the investigatory stop which led to the discovery of the cocaine in the defendant’s possession and that, therefore, the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of the cocaine.

A Richmond police officer saw the defendant shortly after 10:00 p.m. on a playground. The officer was a member of a special unit investigating drugs and firearms. He had made drug related arrests at the playground before and knew…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. Derek James BeckCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. James GoodingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Payne v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  2. Van Andre Beasley v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
  3. Thomas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  5. Miller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API