Legal Opinion

Catino v. Kirschbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 27, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), entered February 10, 1986, as denied his motion for a protective order vacating certain items of the respondents’ demand for the disclosure of the qualifications of his experts.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

While CPLR 3101 (d) (1) (i) grants a party the right to not disclose the name of a prospective medical expert, its underlying purpose is not to preclude any possibility of identifying an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nitz v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Dunsmore v. PaprinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Oppenheimer v. ShubitowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jasopersaud v. Tao Gyoun RhoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Saar v. Brown & Odabashian, P. C.New York Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Thomas v. AlleyneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Carroll v. NunezNew York Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API