Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Frei

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 16, 2018No. 17–P–218Published

1Opinion of the Court

Brian Johnson sued Peter Frei in District Court for violating the State wiretap statute. See G. L. c. 272, § 99(Q) ( § 99 [Q] ). Frei counterclaimed for numerous torts, including a violation of the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act, G. L. c. 12, §§ 11H & 11I (MCRA). The Appellate Division affirmed the jury's verdicts in favor of Johnson on his wiretap claim, and in favor of Frei on his claims under the MCRA and for defamation. It also affirmed the order allowing Johnson's motion for a directed verdict on Frei's abuse of process claim.

In this cross appeal, both parties raise numerous issues.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. L.L., a juvenile v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Bally v. Northeastern UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Inc. v. BlakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Diaz-Rivera v. Rivera-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. Dobos v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API