Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Strauss

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 17, 1938No. Gen. No. 9,073PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Riess

Plaintiff appellants herein have appealed from an order of the circuit court of Pike county, Illinois, allowing solicitors’ fees in the sum of $1,000 to counsel for defendant appellee Albert Strauss, for services performed in the Supreme Court in a chancery suit filed by the plaintiffs to construe certain provisions of the last will and testament and codicils thereto of one Isaac Strauss, deceased.

It appears that Strauss was a merchant and real estate dealer who had died testate in said county, leaving a last will and testament, with three codicils, providing numerous legacies and trust funds…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ingraham v. IngrahamIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Woman's Union Missionary Society of America v. MeadIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Strauss v. StraussIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Lombard v. WitbeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. McCormick v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glaser v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Glaser v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  3. Dyslin v. WolfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API