Sipps v. Pusey
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 108, Oct. T., 1911, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Delaware Co., March Term, 1910, No. 363, on verdict for defendant in case of George L. Sipps v. Fred Taylor Pusey. Replevin for goods seized for rent. Before Johnson, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 108, Oct. T., 1911, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Delaware Co., March Term, 1910, No. 363, on verdict for defendant in case of George L. Sipps v. Fred Taylor Pusey. Replevin for goods seized for rent. Before Johnson, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Errors assigned were in the following form: 1. The learned judge erred in directing a verdict for the defendant. 2. The learned court erred in dismissing defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and in not entering judgment for the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Moeeison, J.,
The appellant has not taken the trouble to print the pleadings in this case, but we gather from the paper-book that the plaintiff was a tenant of the defendant under a written lease, reserving rent, payable monthly, and that the landlord, alleging that there was due him $400 of rent, issued a landlord’s warrant and caused the plaintiff’s goods to be seized as he was in the act of leaving the premmises. Plaintiff then issued a writ of replevin to recover possession of the goods seized. We assume that an issue was made up in which the tenant, George L. Sipps, was made…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estate of CessnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- McGinnis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- McSorley v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- International Savings & Trust Co. v. PrintzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Rothacker v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pusey v. SippsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914