Legal Opinion

Prakhin v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 28, 2017No. 14-924LPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Claim Accrual; Jurisdiction; Motion to Dismiss, Rule of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) 12(b)(1); Statute of Limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2501; Takings Clause, Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THE GOVERNMENT’S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS A TAKINGS CLAUSE CLAIM

BRADEN, Chief Judge.

I. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND. 1

On December 19,1995, Yuriy Prakhin purchased waterfront. property at 3857 Ocean View Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11224 (“the Property’)- Compl. at ¶ 1. This real estate is located in the Sea Gate Community, “a gated…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. BILOXI MARSH LANDS CORPORATION v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  2. Biloxi Marsh Lands Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  3. Biloxi Marsh Lands Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  4. SCARPACIUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API