Legal Opinion

Weill v. Gusdorf

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 11, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ol-inion of xi-ib Court by

Commissioner Hobson

Affirming.

Mrs. A. Gusdorf brought this suit against J. M. Weill, alleging in her petition that she was the owner and entitled to the possession of a race horse named Fusileer, of the value of $1,000, and that the defendant had possession of the horse and had unlawfully detained it from her. She prayed judgment for the horse, or its value. The defendant filed answer, controverting the allegations of the petition, and alleging that he was the owner of the horse. The case was submitted to the jury and it found for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

T…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Higgins v. ForknerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Bronson v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1865

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  2. Frazier v. City of CorbinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API