Legal Opinion

Cap v. K-Mart Discount Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1986No. 2382PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Appellant challenges the lower court determination that his action for malicious prosecution should be dismissed because: (1) the statute of limitations bars the claim, 1 and (2) the complaint does not state a cause of action. Our decision today specifies that the statute of limitations for a malicious prosecution claim begins to run, not on the day of the incident, but at the time a plaintiff is successfully vindicated of the charges against him. Pursuant to this holding, that part of the lower court opinion declaring otherwise is reversed. Our decision also reverses that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Clevenstein v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Kapil v. Association of Pennsylvania State College & University FacultiesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Kedra v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. James Mosley v. Joseph Wilson Lewis Wilson Peter MangoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. Lee v. MihalichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Cosmas v. Bloomingdales Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. McGriff v. VidovichCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. City Of Erie, Pennsylvania v. Guaranty National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API