Legal Opinion · Dissent

Veco Alaska, Inc. v. State, Department of Labor, Division of Workers' Compensation, Second Injury Fund

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2008No. SS-12163Published

1DissentEastaugh, Justice

This is what the board said in the critical passage of the dispositive portion of the decision denying VECO's Second Injury Fund claim:

The Board finds that the employer's written record that the employee had prior back injuries and surgeries, and nothing more, does mot reasonably connote a preexisting arthritic condition and therefore is insufficient as a matter of law to establish the employer's written notice of a pre-existing qualifying disability.

(Emphasis added.) The entire paragraph containing the dispositive portion of the board's decision is attached as Appendix A.

The board's…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Laborers & Hod Carriers Union, Local No. 341 v. GroothuisAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. DeNuptiis v. Unocal Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Leiker v. Manor House, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Kessick v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Denton v. Sunflower Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API