Legal Opinion

H-P Ventures, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided July 19, 1995No. TC 3705PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CARL N. BYERS, Judge.

The Wasco County assessor determined that certain video tapes owned by taxpayer are not exempt as “inventory” and assessed them as omitted property for the 1991-92 through 1993-94 tax years. Taxpayer appeals from the Department of Revenue’s (department) opinion and order sustaining the omitted property assessments.

FACTS

Taxpayer began operating a small video store in December 1990 in The Dalles. It purchased the bulk of its 2,500 video tapes from a broker in Portland. Ninety percent of the tapes purchased were older movies costing $7.50 and $8.50 each and the remaining 10…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Mercy Medical Center, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1992
  4. Freightliner Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Portland Adventist Hospital v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Siuslaw F. Group v. Lane Co. Assessor, Tc-Md 080939c (or.tax 4-17-2009)Oregon Tax Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API