Legal Opinion

Duran v. Springer

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1933No. 3839Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

SADLER, Justice.

Seeking a rehearing, the appellant makes the contention that the running of the period of redemption was never set in motion until the assignment and recording of tax sale certificate on March 28, 1921, and that a tax deed issued on December 8, 1921, there-, after, was premature and void, citing Crawford v. Dillard, 26 N. M. 291, 191 P. 513; Hudson v. Phillips, 29 N. M. 101, 218 P. 787, and Lewis v. Tipton, 29 N. M. 269, 222 P. 661. These were cases dealing either with the 1913 act under which the period of redemption was three years from date of recording the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Crawford v. DillardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Lewis v. TiptonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Hudson v. PhillipsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API