Legal Opinion

Boone v. Hopkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Although the order appealed from was subsumed within the final judgment (CPLR 5501 [a]), in the exercise of our discretion we treat the appeal as taken from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c]; Chin v Kaplan, 280 AD2d 892). We conclude that Supreme Court properly granted plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict on the issue of proximate cause at the close of proof. Both plaintiff’s medical expert and defendants’ medical expert concluded that plaintiff sustained a shoulder injury as a result of the automobile accident at issue, and thus…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Miecznikowski v. RobidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Cross v. Finch Pruyn & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Chin v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Gusek v. Compass Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boone v. HopkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Nichols v. NicholsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API