Legal Opinion

Mullendore Theatres, Inc. v. Growth Realty Investors Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 3, 1984No. 6540-1-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, J.

— Does a landlord's covenant to refund a tenant's security deposit run with the land, thus obligating a successor landlord to refund it? We hold it does not, where the lease permits but does not require that the deposit, if forfeited, be used for the benefit of the leased property.

In 1969, Conner Theatres Corporation became tenant of a part of the Jones Building in Tacoma under a lease that required a deposit of $22,500 as security for performance of the tenant's obligations. The lease provided in part:

Should the Tenant default in the performance of said lease, the landlord shall be entitled…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Raintree Corp. v. RoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Abbott v. BOB'S U-DRIVEOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Rodruck v. Sand Point Maintenance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. RowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Hurxthal v. Boom Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beeter v. Sawyer Disposal LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Lake Arrowhead Community Club, Inc. v. LooneyWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bremmeyer Excavating, Inc. v. McKennaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. 1515-1519 Lakeview Boulevard Condominium Ass'n v. Apartment Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Peyton Building, LLC v. Niko's Gourmet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API