Legal Opinion

I. Hyeon Su v. M/V Southern Aster

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1992No. Nos. 90-35485, 90-35486, 90-35706, 90-35618, 90-35879, 91-35375PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge.

These consolidated cases test the bounds of the Seamen’s Wage Act, 46 U.S.C. § 10313 (1988). The Wage Act protects seafarers from the efforts of unscrupulous shipowners to take advantage of their superior economic position to withhold payment of promised wages. Each case requires us to resolve this question: Do the Wage Act’s protections extend to foreign crews discharged from foreign ships in foreign ports? Although Congress likely could have extended the Wage Act this far, we conclude that it did not. The structure, history and, more important, the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Commissioner v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael White, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. Brown, George v. Jess, CathyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2021
  3. Ficht v. BramanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  4. Knight v. TrotterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  5. Luna v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API