Legal Opinion · Dissent

Robert L. Lee, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rapid City Area School District No. 51-4, Appellant/cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 3, 1992No. 90-5499, 90-5500Published

1DissentLoken, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the court’s decision for three reasons. First, I would grant the School District a new trial because evidence of oral complaints was improperly excluded. Second, I would hold that the evidence was insufficient to support an award of liquidated damages as a matter of law. Third, if liquidated damages are awarded, I would uphold the district court’s discretion to limit those damages to $10,000.

A. Exclusion of Complaint Testimony.

The School District alleged that Lee’s contract was not renewed because of his poor performance as a teacher. Principal Wes Storm and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Barbara Franklin McKenna v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API