Legal Opinion

Jannello v. Parker

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David Goldstein, J.

The case presents a novel issue relating to the nature and extent of disclosure which may properly be accorded to a party in conjunction with the production of surveillance tapes and whether, on this record, defendants may conduct a second examination before trial of the plaintiff. The surveillance here took place while the case was on the Trial Calendar, at times between one year and one year and four months after plaintiffs deposition, an examination which defendants concede was full and complete in all respects.

The action, sounding in medical…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Rios v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Kane v. Her-Pet Refrigeration, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Marte v. W.O. Hickok Mfg. Co., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rotundi v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Simon v. Krueger International, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Tai Tran v. New Rochelle Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API