In re Pitt

*340OPINION OF THE COURT

By order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey, filed December 8, 1993, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law in that State for six months, effective January 3, 1994, and continuing until further order of that court, for his failure to safeguard property and his failure to cooperate with the New Jersey ethics authorities. The New Jersey order stipulated that, upon reinstatement, the respondent must practice under the supervision of a proctor for one year.

On January 19, 1994, the respondent was served with a notice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3 (b), informing him…