Legal Opinion

Edel v. Callen

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County

Decided May 31, 2013No. 10067-2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

COX, J.,

— Before the court for disposition are the preliminary objections To plaintiff’s amended complaint filed on behalf of the defendant Ted Callen, individually and doing business as Two Fat Guys And An Oven, which argue the following:

I. The plaintiff’s amended complaint does not conform to Pa.R.C.P. No. 1024(b) as it asserts inconsistent causes of action in counts I, II, III and IV without attaching the proper verification;

II. Count II of the plaintiff’s amended complaint lacks *542specificity and is legally insufficient as the plaintiff has failed to specify the alleged breach by the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Corestates Bank, N.A. v. CutilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Bash v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. R.W. v. ManzekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Styer v. HugoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API