Otte v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
RAPER, Justice,
dissenting in part and concurring in part, with whom THOMAS, Justice joins.
I dissent in part and concur in part.
*1367Dissent — Blackmail
I dissent from the holding that the crime of blackmail was not supported by the record. The potential result is that the majority has effectively aborted the usefulness of Wyoming’s blackmail statute when a blackmail threat has been intercepted by means of police intervention. Law enforcement officers, for the purposes of pursuing a blackmail offense in the making, may not now take the known victim into their confidence. This removes a necessary…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State v. ManciniSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- Bentley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
- United States v. Charles Thomas Bryan and James Eston Echols. Appeal of Charles Thomas BryanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Harris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.