Hicks v. Big Bros./Big Sisters of America
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sherry C. Hicks (hereinafter “Hicks”) now moves this Court pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 30(b)(7)1 and 37(a)(2) to order that a deposition be taken by telephone and to compel production of documents. For the reasons that follow, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff Hicks instituted this employment discrimination action against Defendant Big Brothers/Big Sisters of America (“Big Brothers”) to recover damages for her allegedly wrongful discharge. Hicks now seeks an order requiring that a deposition of a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Great West Life Assurance Co. v. LevithanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Bayges v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- Clemens v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- DAVIS v. SOLARIS OILFIELD SITE SERVICES OPERATING, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- FABIAN v. SHENKANDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Forcine Concrete and Construction Company v. MS Park Construction LLC, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Gwendolyn Coney v. 3M Healthcare US OPCO, LLC, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.