Legal Opinion

Howell v. Bach

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILHOIT, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Breathitt Circuit Court granting a summary judgment to the individual appellees on their claim of entitlement to share in royalties paid to their cotenants, appellants Tre-va and Jeff Howell, under the terms of an agreement made by the Howells without the knowledge of these appellees. We affirm.

The Howells and the individual appellees are the joint owners of certain mineral rights which are presently leased from them by appellee Falcon Coal Company. In 1966 all of the then-co-owners of the mineral rights joined in a written lease of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Childress v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Larmon v. LarmonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Givens v. GivensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  4. Hollowell v. HobbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. Nelson's Heirs v. Clay's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1832

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. James T. Scatuorchio Racing Stable, LLC v. Walmac Stud Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013
  2. Stoltz v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. Boug, LLC v. Shenandoah Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2025
  4. Boug, LLC v. Shenandoah Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API