Legal Opinion

Culhane v. Etting

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1915No. File No. 3723PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Circuit 'Court, Brookings County. ITon. Carl G. Sherwood, Judge. Action 'by John Culhane and another, partners as Culhane & Kinney, against George Btting and another. From a judgment for defendants, and from an order denying a. new trial, plaintiffs appeal.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Circuit 'Court, Brookings County. ITon. Carl G. Sherwood, Judge. Action 'by John Culhane and another, partners as Culhane & Kinney, against George Btting and another. From a judgment for defendants, and from an order denying a. new trial, plaintiffs appeal. (1) Under point one of the opinion, Appellant cited: Hunt v. Brown, 15 N. E. 590 (Mass.); Brown v. Gallaudet, 80 N. Y. 413; Eessler v. Gerli, 126 N. Y. Suppl. 698. Respondent cited: 23 C)”c. 729; 24 Esncy. of Law, 796; Brigg v. Richmond, (Mass.) 20 Am. Dec. 526; Abbott v. Stevens, J17 Mass. 340, 342; 2 Black on Judgments, Sec.…

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, P. J.

[1] In this action plaintiff sought to recover from defendants a bill for threshing in the fall of 1910. The defendants admitted the performance of the threshing for them, and on the trial the amount of the value of such services was stipulated to be $132.18; and it was also* stipulated that said claim for said threshing was unpaid, unless the same was satisfied by a credit which was allowed to plaintiffs in a certain judgment rendered in the circuit court in, a prior action wherein these defendants, Btting and Mills, were plaintiffs, and these plaintiffs in this action, together with certain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Abbott v. StevensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Downs v. Bruce Independent School District No. 49South Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API