People v. Edmund
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Balio, J.
Defendant was convicted of criminal possession of a *197controlled substance in the first degree, a class A-I felony. There is no merit to defendant’s contentions that the prosecution failed to corroborate the testimony of an accomplice or that imposition of the minimum indeterminate term of imprisonment mandated by statute was harsh and excessive. Further discussion of these issues is unnecessary. Defendant also contends that the suppression court erred in refusing to suppress physical evidence (cocaine) seized by law enforcement personnel and statements made by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. CarrilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. CarrilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. Mejia-GuzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. MeltonNew York Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.