Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 26, 1903No. 2653PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was convicted of burglary, the penalty assessed being two years confinement in the penitentiary.

By the first bill of exceptions it is made to appear that the accomplice, Engram Murray, was permitted to testify that on the night of the 4th of August, 1902, he went to the saloon of J.A. Tillman, and by appointment found appellant there, and remained until 1 o'clock. That afterwards he and defendant went to a chile stand, waked up the Mexican, ate a plate of chile and a watermelon. Subsequently witness and defendant proceeded to the saloon occupied by Tillman, and witness broke a pane…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
  2. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Nash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Padgett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  3. Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Bowman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Lancaster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API