Legal Opinion
United States v. David George Kramer
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1999No. 97-2289PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant David George Kramer appeals the district court’s denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(e) motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Kramer contends that his guilty plea was involuntary. He asserts that he was ill when his plea was taken and consequently did not understand the ramifications of his plea; he further contends that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate adequately the facts of his case before his plea or trial. Because we believe that appellant failed to meet his burden under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(e) of establishing that there was a “fair…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Harry Jarmar GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Wesley Alan CarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. CorrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- United States of America, and v. Cheryl Marie Gigley, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. SiedlikCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.