Legal Opinion
Glatt v. Sisco
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 4, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 502-54PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MODARELLI, District Judge.
This is an action based upon Patent No. 2,570,11o,1 filed June 29, 1950, and issued to plaintiff, Herbert Glatt, October 2, 1951. The complaint alleges that defendants infringe the patent by making and selling ironing pad covers embodying the plaintiff’s patent. The answer denies infringement and alleges that the patent is invalid for want of invention. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on the ground- that the patent is invalid. They rely on plaintiff’s deposition, a specimen of defendants’ ironing pad cover, the file wrapper of the patent in suit, copies of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Packwood v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Sutherland Paper Co. v. Grant Paper Box Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Chiplets, Inc. v. June Dairy Products Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- The Borden Company v. Clearfield Cheese Co., Inc., a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Messing v. Quiltmaster CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961