Legal Opinion

Zebrasky v. Valdes

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 2008No. 07 MA 34PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DeGenaro, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court, the parties’ briefs, and their oral arguments before this court. Plaintiff- appellant, Thomas Zebrasky, appeals the decision of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas that found that the dispute between Zebrasky and defendantappellee, Alfonso Valdes, was not subject to the arbitration clause in the contract signed by the two parties. On appeal, Zebrasky argues that the trial court erred when reaching this conclusion because the dispute between the parties is over a change in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Saunders v. MortensenOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Independence Bank v. Erin MechanicalOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 20 v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Ass'n v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United Elec. Radio & Mach. Workers of Am. v. Highland Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Morrow County2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API