Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Seaman
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 16, 1999No. 23784-9-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.
After claiming she was involved, in a hit- and-run accident, Anne Seaman sought underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage from her insurer, State Farm. State Farm denied the claim and filed an action seeking declaratory relief. Seaman counterclaimed for benefits under her insurance policy. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court concluded that there was no coverage and entered a summary judgment dismissing her claim. Seaman appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
In the midafternoon hours of February 17, 1997, Seaman’s vehicle was rear-ended by another vehicle when she was making a legal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Allstate Insurance v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Greer v. Northwestern National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Griffin Wasik v. Auto Club Insurance AssociationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022
- Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. FarmerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019