Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mason v. Mason

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 2016No. 16-287Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPickett, J.

U agree with the majority on all but one issue in this matter. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that because Deanna filed a summary proceeding seeking a change of custody, the trial court’s modification of her visitation schedule, without that issue being raised by the father in pleadings or orally at trial, does not constitute error. An answer need not be filed in a summary, proceeding.. La.Code Civ,P. 2592. An answer need only admit or deny allegations stated in the petition and assert any affirmative defenses to the petitioner’s claim. La.Code Civ.P. arts. 1001-1005, Deanna did…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brooks v. BrooksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API