Legal Opinion

United States v. Rafael S. Pena, Gary W. Chitty

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 2, 1990No. 88-5895PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge:

Following a four-day trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, a jury found Gary W. Chitty and Rafael S. Pena guilty of both conspiracy to import and the importation of more than 100 kilograms of marijuana into the United States, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 963, 952(a) and 960(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Chitty appeals the district court’s denial of his motion in limine in which he sought to exclude certain testimony as an impermissible comment upon his exercise of his right to remain silent. Pena appeals the district court’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Holland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  2. United States v. Leonard A. PelulloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Jorge Enrique Gonzalez, A/K/A George, Maurice Roundy, Michael Timothy SweetonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Gerald Anthony Coleman v. Harry K. Singletary, Robert A. ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API