Legal Opinion

Howard Savings Institution v. Baronych

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 7, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

8 N.J. Super. 599 (1950)

73 A.2d 853

THE HOWARD SAVINGS INSTITUTION, A MUTUAL SAVINGS BANK OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

SUSAN BARONYCH AND STEPHEN BARONYCH AS EXECUTORS OF THE WILL AND CODICILS OF MAX GLUCK, DECEASED, & C., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided June 7, 1950.

Mr. Wm. H. Osborne, Jr., for the plaintiff (Mr. S. Allen Craft, of counsel, Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Ward, attorneys).

Mr. James R.E. Ozias for the defendants Susan Baronych and Stephen Baronych, etc. (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer, attorneys).

Mr. Milton M. Unger for the defendant Lev…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harrison v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  2. Cutts v. NajdrowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
  3. Rosenbaum v. GarrettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1898
  4. Bendix v. Hudson County National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  5. In Re Estate of UrlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doyle v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  2. Howard Savings Institution v. QuatraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Clark v. Citizens Nat. Bank of CollingswoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Doyle v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  5. Steiger v. Steiger CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API