Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dieringer v. Bachman

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1948No. 10064PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lovins, - Judge:

The purpose of this original proceeding in mandamus is to compel the mayor and city manager of the City of Wheeling to appoint a member of a civil service commission provided for in Section 2, Chapter 60, Acts of the Legislature, Regular Session, 1933. Relator, Harry Dier-inger, is a member of the paid fire department of the City of Wheeling. Defendants, Carl G. Bachman and C. Hal Brues, are the mayor and city manager, respectively, of said city.

The legislative intent and purpose of Chapter 60, id., is declared in Section 19 thereof, which reads, in part, as follows: “It is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Budd v. HancockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  2. Whitlock v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  3. State Ex Rel. McLaughlin v. MorrisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Groves v. County Court of Grant CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Prichard v. DevanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Appalachian Power Co. v. GainerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Greenbrier County Airport Authority v. HannaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State Ex Rel. Heck's, Inc. v. GatesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Tweel v. West Virginia Racing CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State Ex Rel. Brotherton v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API