Legal Opinion

Bell v. Traders and Mechanics Insurance Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1972No. 7229SC596PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the court’s refusal of his motion to strike certain portions of the plaintiff’s reply alleging waiver. Defendant contends plaintiff’s reply does not specifically state the facts constituting waiver, and so should be struck as an insufficient defense under Rule 12(f) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 8(c) designates waiver as an affirmative defense. The language in Rule 8(a), dealing with general pleading, and that in Rule 8(c), dealing with pleading affirmative defenses, is largely identical: (such pleading shall contain) “a short and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harvel's, Inc. v. EgglestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Horton v. Iowa Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vernon v. CristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. M Series Rebuild, LLC v. Town of Mount PleasantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. McDevitt v. StacyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Albertson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Albertson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API