Legal Opinion

Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. Hyatt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 8, 1896No. 2115PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Associate Justice.

It is contended by appellant company, that neither the common law nor any statute required it to Avarm' its coaches in cold weather, and that plaintiffs should have plead and. proved a universal custom for railroad companies to warm their passenger coaches for the benefit of the public, in order to entitle them to-recover.

The petition objected to stated that Mrs. Hyatt and her babe and children were required, by the conductor and agents in charge of the train, to ride from Clarendon to Amarillo in a coach provided.with stoves for heating purposes, but Avith no fires…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Scalf v. Collin CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RichardsTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HepnerTexas Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API