Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. Hyatt
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Associate Justice.
It is contended by appellant company, that neither the common law nor any statute required it to Avarm' its coaches in cold weather, and that plaintiffs should have plead and. proved a universal custom for railroad companies to warm their passenger coaches for the benefit of the public, in order to entitle them to-recover.
The petition objected to stated that Mrs. Hyatt and her babe and children were required, by the conductor and agents in charge of the train, to ride from Clarendon to Amarillo in a coach provided.with stoves for heating purposes, but Avith no fires…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Scalf v. Collin CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RichardsTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HepnerTexas Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913