Legal Opinion

Murray v. United States Attorney's Office

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 8, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00259Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 11 SARA MURRAY, CASE NO. 2:25-cv-00259-LK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DENIAL OF MOTION v. TO RECUSE 13 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 14 et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter has been referred to the undersigned to review Chief Judge David G. 18 Estudillo’s March 31, 2025, decision not to recuse himself from reviewing Judge Lauren King’s 19 denial of Plaintiff Sara Murray’s motion seeking Judge King’s recusal from this matter. 20 (“Estudillo Order”). Dkt. No. 17. Having reviewed the Estudillo Order;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. John McTiernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Oppenheimer-TorresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. American Optical Co. v. Shuron Optical Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API