Legal Opinion

Ballester v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 14, 2004No. 3D02-1588Published

1Per curiam

This is an appeal of an order denying the motion of defendant-appellant Balles-*1262ter for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The proceeding below was an evidentiary hearing on remand from Ballester v. State, 781 So.2d 503 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

The trial court found that the defendant had shown good ground for relief from the time bar of Rule 3.850. See Demps v. State, 696 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). The trial court denied the motion as being impermissibly successive and, alternatively, on the merits.

For simplicity we assume (without deciding) that there was no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Major v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Demps v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Ballester v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. MacHin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API