Legal Opinion

Norvelle v. City of Hobart

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 1993No. 79680PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Chief Judge:

On May 22, 1992, Appellant Norvelle timely filed a Petition in Error seeking reversal of a trial court order denying his Petition for temporary and permanent injunctions to prohibit Appellee, the City of Hobart, from enforcing a newly enacted city ordinance.

After a Supreme Court order requiring him to amend his Petition in Error, Appellant filed an amended Petition in Error attaching the order of the trial court. On November 12, 1992, the Supreme Court entered an order telling Appellant that unless he filed a Notice of Completion of Record by 12-3-92, the appeal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Worthington v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Matter of Estate of RayCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. First National Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brandon v. BrandonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API