Legal Opinion

Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 3, 2003No. 01-1191, 01-1218Published

1Opinion of the Court

314 F.3d 1313

AMGEN INC., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant,

v.

HOECHST MARION ROUSSEL, INC. (now known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 01-1191.

No. 01-1218.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: January 6, 2003.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied: March 3, 2003.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Lloyd R. Day, Jr., Day, Casebeer, Madrid & Batchelder, LLP, of Cupertino, CA, argued for plaintiff-cross appellant. Of counsel on…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API