Legal Opinion
People v. Hannig
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1780Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal mischief in the third degree (Penal Law § 145.05 [2]). We note at the outset that defendant’s release to parole supervision does not render moot defendant’s contention that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe because defendant “ ‘remains under the control of the Parole Board until his sentence has terminated’ ” (People v Rowell, 5 AD3d 1073, 1074 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 806 [2004]; see also People v Brown, 39 AD3d 1021 [2007]). We nevertheless reject defendant’s contention with respect to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. HorneNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. LovettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. RowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. Jorge N.T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- AUCTER, STEVEN, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- BARBER, STEPHEN M., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- MCCARTHY, RONALD E., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- SEBRING, RICKY, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.