Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Mutual Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term, Albany county. Action by Patrick E. Walsh, assignee, against the Mutual Life Insurance Company. From an order overruling a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLearned, P. J.

The defendant issued, March 23,1864, a policy on the'life of Veis Traub in favor of Eica Traub, his wife, agreeing to pay the amount to her, “for her sole use, if living, in conformity with the statute, and, if not living, to her children, or their guardian for their use.” There were three children of Veis Traub and Eica Traub, viz., Bessie Gross, Solomon Traub, Carrie Van Schiack. Bessie Gross died intestate, April, 1886, leaving, surviving, her husband and two children. Eica Traub died April, 1887. Solomon Traub died intestate, June, 1887, leaving his widow, Henrietta, (now Heinzel,) and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goebel v. . WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Whitehead v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Continental Life Insurance v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
  4. United States Trust Co. v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Anderson v. . GoldsmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walsh v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API