Legal Opinion
Buffum v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 6, 1935No. 7461PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
The order sought to be reviewed by this appeal was made February 24, 1934, and is as follows: “Without determining the question of the amount for which the claim of Peter Barceloux Company should be allowed, it is ordered that the order of the referee rejecting said claim and amendment thereto be and the same is hereby overruled and the matter returned to the referee for further proceedings.”
Petition for appeal from this order was allowed by the District Court on March 12, 1934. The petition for the allowance of the appeal is predicated upon section 25, subd. (a) (3) of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Duryea Power Co. v. SternberghSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gerald S. Cope, Trustee v. Aetna Finance Company of Maine, in the Matter of Robert R. Richards, DebtorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- W. Cecil Sisson Mortgage Company v. Houston Shell & Concrete, Division of McDonough CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Woodmar Realty Company v. JuliusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Woodmar Realty Co. v. JuliusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Buffum v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937