Legal Opinion
In re Lloyd
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 3, 1884PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Bankruptcy. Stir proof by Lloyd, Huff & Watt against the estate of Wm. M. Lloyd.
1Opinion of the CourtAcheson, J.
Lloyd, Huff & Watt, by their assignee in bankruptcy,, Jesse Chambers, tender proof of debt against the separate estate in *91bankruptcy of Wm. M. Lloyd, one of the members of said firm. His assignee in bankruptcy, J. W. Curry, and his separate creditors, resist the proof. Wm. M. Lloyd was adjudged a bankrupt upon the petition of- his creditors, and the firm of Lloyd, Huff & Watt upon the petition of W. H. Watt, one of its members. The said firm, composed of Wm. M. Lloyd,, George J. Huff, and W. H. Watt, did a general banking business at Latrobe, Pennsylvania. Wm. M. Lloyd, did a separate and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re McEwenDistrict Court, D. Indiana · 1875
- In re MayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1879
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re TelferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910