Legal Opinion
Veurink v. Murphy
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided June 25, 2019No. 4:18-cv-04021Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION ANGELA VEURINK, 18-4021 Plaintiff, VS. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PARTIAL DR. JILL MURPHY SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Pending before the Court is Defendant, Dr. Jill Murphy’s (“Dr. Murphy”), Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff, Angela Veurink’s (“Ms. Veurink”) claim for fraud and deceit. Doc. 23. For the following reasons, the motion is denied. FACTS Dr. Murphy is a board-certified plastic surgeon, and during the events at issue in this case, practiced with Plastic Surgery Associates of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Biegler v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- General Finance Corporation, Bankrupt, by Ronald W. Wright, Trustee v. The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Bruske v. HilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Estate of Elliott Ex Rel. Elliott v. a & B Welding Supply Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.