Legal Opinion

D'Aloia v. City of Summit

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 12, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On appeal from the District Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Black, J.

The appeal in this case presents a single point for discussion and decision, viz., whether the payments of lines which were the subject of the suit in the trial court, were voluntary payments and made without duress of the person.

The action was brought by the plaintiff, as assignee, to recover lines from the city of Summit, imposed upon five defendants, by the police court of the city of Summit, for the violation of a city ordinance. Subsequent to the imposition and payment of the fines, the conviction of the five defendants was, upon review,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Houtz v. Board of CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Harrington v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Bailey v. Town of PaullinaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Houlehan v. Inhabitants of Kennebec CountySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FogartySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. People v. BandyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  3. Ewert v. LichtmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  4. State v. FogartySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API