Legal Opinion

In RE WILLIAMS v. Rhay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1968No. 39698PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Walterskirchen, J. †

This is an appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus following a hearing pursuant to Kent v. United States, 383 U. S. 541, 16 L. Ed. 2d 84, 86 Sup. Ct. 1045 (1966), and In re Dillenburg v. Maxwell, 70 Wn.2d 331, 413 P.2d 940, 422 P.2d 783 (1967).

Petitioner, on January 17, 1961, was 17 years and 4 months of age, when the juvenile court judge signed an order transferring him to adult status. He was then charged, in the superior court, with the crime of burglary in the second degree, counsel was appointed for him, petitioner pled guilty, and he was sentenced to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In RE DILLENBURG v. MaxwellWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In RE SHEPPARD v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Clark v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harbert v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. PicheWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. BurttsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. State v. DainardWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API