Legal Opinion
Montano v. Lee
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 5, 1967No. 146, Docket 31631PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge.
The appellants, residents and qualified voters of New Haven, brought this action in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, alleging that the New Haven Board of Aldermen was malapportioned and therefore violative of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States under Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 12 L.Ed.2d 506 (1964).
On March 24, 1966, pursuant to appellants’ motion for summary judgment, the court held the then current districting plan for the New Haven Board of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Silverman v. St. Joseph's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- LoFrisco v. SchafferDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1972
- Hoblitzelle v. FrechetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- George J. Montano v. Richard C. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Montano v. LeeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.