Legal Opinion

Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. Tuggle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 30, 1917No. 8708PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

This appeal is prosecuted by the Ft. Worth & Rio Grande Railway Company and G. H. Schleyer and Avery Turner, its receivers, from a joint.judgment rendered against them in favor of plaintiff, T. H. Tuggle, upon pleadings alleging, substantially, that through defective construction and maintenance of the roadbed of the defendant railway company across plaintiff’s land the natural flow of water from rainfall had been so obstructed and diverted as to cause the overflow of plaintiff’s land adjacent to the roadbed and the destruction of crops growing thereon. The trial was by the court without the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cotulla v. Thomas Goggan & Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Wandry v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. Highland Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Boyette v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Irwin v. State Nat. Bank of Ft. WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Beaumont Irrigating Co. v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Warren v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Fidelity Union Fire Ins. Co. v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API