Legal Opinion

Decker v. . Furniss

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1856PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The plaintiffs' right to recover must depend on the construction of the agreement between the defendants Furniss and Brown, concerning the sale of the boat Rhode Island. If the agreement amounted to an executed sale of one-half the boat, then the defendant Furniss became a joint owner, and is jointly liable with Brown for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ward v. ShawNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Outwater v. DodgeNew York Supreme Court · 1827

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hale v. . Omaha National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  3. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. SharpNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Butler v. . ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Wickham v. LevineNew York Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API