Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fortenberry v. City of Jackson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 2011No. Nos. 2008-CT-00270-SCT, 2008-CT-00271-SCTPublished

1DissentRandolph, Justice

¶ 28. According to the circuit court, “[wjhen to repair, how to repair, where to repair, and how much money to spend on repairs are all decisions better left to the city governments of this state.” In my opinion, the circuit court’s conclusion, upheld by the Majority, is overbroad and misconstrues the plain language of Mississippi Code Section 21-27-189(b). (Maj. Op. at ¶ 26). Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

¶ 29. Under Section 21 — 27—189(b), there is no question that the City had the discretionary authority “[t]o construct, operate and maintain sewage systems.... ” Miss. Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Mississippi Dept. of Transp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Collins v. Tallahatchie CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Mississippi Dept. of Transp. v. CargileMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Bridges v. Pearl River Valley Water Supply Dist.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  5. City of Jackson v. Internal Engine Parts Group, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API