Legal Opinion

Clute v. MacH

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1951No. 329llPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This is an action to recover the reasonable and agreed price for the drilling of a well and the erection of a windmill on defendant’s ranch, and for labor, supplies, and materials, all in the sum of $120 and interest.

Defendant answered that the agreement was that plaintiff was to put down two wells at $60 each and had put down only one. Defendant cross-petitioned and asked $20 for hauling plaintiff’s machinery to town on two occasions for repairs, for furnishing board and room to plaintiff of the reasonable value of $25, and for failure to put down the second well he alleged $215 damage.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coryell v. Robinson Outdoor Advertising Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Wilson v. DallasNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hilligas v. FarrNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Sharman v. Webber Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API